|
8/27/2026 NHIM - Lifecycle ManagementIntroduction
Non-Human Identities (NHIs) need to be governed end to end, under a Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) program, to ensure security and compliance. Shadow AI has compounded this problem. The NHIM governance program should manage the initial provisioning of the NHI to the access rights changes and the final de-provisioning. It should also include the implementation of policies and controls that enable least privilege, just-in-time access, and removal of identities to reduce the attack surface. Importance of Lifecycle Management The principles of Lifecycle management remain the same for NHI except that they need to be more stringent and monitored. Insufficient controls on the Lifecycle of NHIs increases the attack surface. It could be an over permissioned account, unrotated or long-lived credentials or NHIs without traceable ownership. With the AI agents the Non-Human Identity Lifecycle compounds as these can be autonomous and, in some cases, give rise to ephemeral agents with certain level of access. Use Cases Decommissioning Unlike the Workforce/Human identity, the NHIs typically do not carry a trigger like a termination or end of employment, to indicate deactivation or removal. This results in active credentials with access to sensitive data, applications, APIs, etc. The following should be implemented as part of the NHI Lifecycle processes:
Creation Actively manage NHI creation. This should be a policy implementation across the board. Developers and infrastructure admins must not be permitted to embed credentials in IaC, scripts, or code without explicit approval. A workflow needs to be in place for any NHI creation. The following principles should be implemented as part of this:
Vaulting and Rotation On creation, set default properties for the NHI to be rotated on a set timer. It can be every 30, 60, or 90 days depending upon the Risk categorization of the NHI/target application.
Continuous Authentication and Authorization Static token grants or permission grants like roles or entitlements pose a threat. Once leaked or hijacked, the chances of damage to the infrastructure or data go up multiple times. The NHIs do not have a Multi Factor Authentication set up and hence a stricter dynamic policy needs to be set up. The following can be implemented to enforce this, if not already implemented:
Regular Access Reviews It’s common for the NHIs to not be managed directly. There are situations where an NHI could remain active beyond its end date or continue working with more permissions than were intended. Reviews should be a regular process, especially for the NHIs. This policy can be separate from the workload identities and should be implemented at slightly increased frequency as some NHIs can be short-lived.
Conclusion Unlike workforce identities, the NHIs and specially AI agents, often do not follow formal and process-oriented creation and access modification paths – with a lot of this action happening on the fly by various teams. Managing the Lifecycle of NHIs thus becomes the most crucial part of any NHIM program to ensure security and compliance. Disciplined creation, vaulting and rotation, continuous authentication and authorization, timely decommissioning, and regular access reviews together close the gaps that most commonly lead to over-permissioned accounts, long-lived credentials, and orphaned identities. The aim of these best practices is to help understand the challen Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWe’re a team of experts, helping businesses tackle digital security challenges. Specializing in identity management, IoT security, and embedded automation, we create tailored solutions to meet current needs and support future growth. Our aim is to simplify complex issues and help businesses thrive in the digital landscape. |